In Tess of the D’Uberviless, Hardy exposes
structures of the woman’s role through the religious’ laws and beliefs of that
period. Tess, raped and tainted by a sin she did not commit, has troubled relationships
with Alec, who raped her, and Angel, who has doubts about religious doctrines.
Although Tess herself did
not commit a sin in the beginning, being raped established the position she
would have to take in society, both social and religious. Neither Alec nor
Angel are judge by their communities, mainly because of a patriarchal aspect of
protestant society; in which, according to Larson (2004) is part of a denial of
Armenians and the defense of the idealistic men, the Manly Christian, which
includes the domination of women by men and their obedience. We see it clearer
in some facts, i.e., Angel had had an affair with an older woman, but he is not
judge by that, however, in Tess’s case, she is judge and even impure, which
makes her to accept Angel’s rejection. Tess is not only part of rule in gender,
but also part of a lower social class. Ingham (2003) argues that the gravity of female criminality was
usually seen to involve what were called ‘crimes of morality’ and was measured
by the failure of working-class women to live up to the middle-class model.
In the rape, the entire fault relies upon Tess, who cannot be forgiven and need
to accept her fate.
When Tess meets Alec again,
the narrative exposes the injustice role of women, a gender that cannot be
forgiven; the justice relies on a pragmatic scheme of purification, as Tess
says, a scheme
of religion. Alec is now a Methodist[1],
receiving the fruits of the Spirit, which Tess finds a scheme of lies; while he
is now a saint, she is still impure.
References
INGHAM, Patricia. The interlocked code of class and
gender. In: ____. The language of gender
and class: transformations in the Victorian novel. London: Routledge, 2003.
LARSON, Janet L. Skeptical
Women v. Honest Men v. Good Old Boys: Gender Conflict in the High Victorian Religion Wars.
In: NIXON, Jude V. Victorian religious discourse. England:
Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
[1] Here there may be an opposition
between Calvinist ethics against the new role of Armenian’s doctrine. Methodism’s
doctrines denies predestination which make one’s free will possible, something
that Tess denies and seems to be part of the tragic aspect of the novel.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário